Sarah Thorne: I don't know how to put it into percentage, but spanking is a huge chunk of my kink. One of the biggest factors, in fact. However, I do like a lot of mild BDSM stuff, and consensual non-consent in conjunction with that kink.
I dunno. I am not very 'pure' by your description. Maybe 60%?
Sara: Wow, I didn't even know there WAS such a thing as a "pure spanko!" Is that like NO interest in other sexual activity or play? That seems kind of... well, very boring to me! "Variety is the spice of life" and all that!
James: I agree with Sara. I love spanking, but I also enjoy the other pleasures that go with it.
Curtis: Semi-pure here. I'm basically into OTK hand spanking. I'm not into BDSM, discipline, punishment, etc. But then there's the question of sex and vibrators and that can, with the right person, be very much part of agenda, with mutual interest and consent.
Dragon's Rose: I love a little kink with my whips and paddles, I do admit. OTK by itself would be dull, and all punishment without play? No way!
Six of the Best: I would consider myself a 'pure spanko.' Yes, the only part of the body that interests me, is a naughty lady's bare bottom. And I love to spank it. Be it with the hand, paddle, hairbrush, birchrod, or cane. Yes, down with her panties, knickers, or bloomers, and spank it most enjoyably blushingly red.
Faerie: I'm definitely not a purist by the definition given. I am very interested in other kinky stuff and thanks to all the reading I've been doing, I have found all kinds of stuff I never thought of. My husband is more then willing to help me explore, though sometimes, I think he welcomes going back to work on Mondays just to get some rest. LOL. I have encouraged him to complain to his friends that he is getting too much sex as I'm sure they will commiserate with him. Yeah, that usually gets me a swat as he's walking out the door. Hee hee hee.
Hermione: I consider myself to be a true spanko because spanking, and only spanking, excites me, whether by thought, word or deed. I don't care to be swatted on any part of my body other than my bottom. As for other BDSM-related activities, I have no desire to try the few I know about. Vibrators are fun, but they don't figure in our spanking scenarios. Being restrained is an exciting, but very rare occurrence. I enjoy it only in the context of being spanked, not for its own sake. So I'd rate myself at about 98%. Nobody's perfect.
Duality: I also agree with Sara. Spanking definitely has its place and it sets the framework for most everything we do, but it's not the only thing. So maybe half for me.
Abby: I would say maybe 30 percent. Spanking is almost always a part, but there are lots of extra add-ons that I also love!
Sunny Girl: I am with Hermione. Spanking excites me in thought, word and deed and I don't want to be spanked in any area but my bottom. I'm not interested in any other BDSM activities. I have tried a few things and it's okay, but not necessary. I love the vibrators though. They always enhance the experience for me.
Kitty: Considering that I had never been spanked until earlier this year, I'd say spanking is a fun addition to many other activities involving sex, but it's not the most important.
Todd and Suzy: We consider spanking our ~main~ kinky interest, but it most certainly isn't the only interest (including other types of non-bottom spanking). We're spankos who are into other things, as opposed to people who are into lots of things, including spanking. So spanking first, for sure, but then there's a decent size list below that.
Grace: I'm with Sara. Variety is the spice of life! ;)
Fred Bloggs: I am a pure pervert, into all kinds of stuff. Spanking is just a teeny weeny part of my kink.
Dr. Ken: I don't know that I'm a "pure spanko," but I'm probably pretty darn close!
Lisa (Tantra Flower): I don't have much experience. I know I only like to be spanked on my bare bottom and only with hands. My ex-husband was the first man I ever trusted with this fetish of mine and I haven't found anyone since. Spanking is just one of many things that excite me, but I don't think I could be fully satisfied with a sex life that did not include it. I'm glad I found your blog. Thanks.
Welcome, Lisa!
Daisy: I am with Hermione. I'm not into vibrators, masturbation, or being spanked other than my bottom. Restraints are OK occasionally for spanking purposes only. I do find anything spanking-related turns me on. It sends little thrills of pleasure through me and I have had an orgasm from a spanking alone (awesome). As for vibrators, wax, etc, NO THANK YOU! So I guess I am about 98% pure spanko.
Florida Dom: I like spanking, but it is just one tasty dish on the menu for me. I like to sample many, many dishes.
Prefectdt: I have, and probably will again, dabbled my toes in BDSM waters. But this just tends to reinforce my feelings that I am only really interested in being at the receiving end of corporal punishment.
I feel that there is more to spanking than getting it on the butt though. Tawsing on the hands is strong in the spanko tradition, for an example.
Joeyred51: I am not a pure spanko. I enjoy other types of play as well. Also, I find Shibari rope bondage lots of fun, as both bottom and top.
Our Bottoms Burn: I am 100% pure. Bacall likes a little light bondage once in awhile.
After the spanking is complete we both want release, either coupled or via electromechanical means. If you meant spanking without sex, it would be “why bother?” for us.
Ronnie: Variety is the spice of life and we are all different, but for me, the spice is the spanking. Restrains I like, but only if part of spanking. As Daisy says, to have an orgasm from spanking is something else.
So would that make me a "pure spanko?" No, not totally.
Bonnie: No purity here. Spanking lies at the core of our sexuality. It is another form of sex for Randy and me. When we enjoy other activities like restraint or buzzing toys, they are in conjunction with spanking and sex.
Thank you all for joining in our brunch discussion!
No comments :
Post a Comment